In LED lighting, matching the driver topology to the power level can be challenging. There are a number of topologies to choose from, but which one will give the right balance of size, performance, and cost? A quick look at the specific requirements for each power range — low, middle, and high — yields recommendations for the best power-switching technology for each power range.
Low-power lighting includes candle, R-lamps and incandescent replacements running at under 20W. These are small bulbs mostly used in residential and retail environments. Size and cost are the two biggest concerns, so using a primary-side regulated (PSR) topology is a good choice. A PSR controller delivers precise control of the output voltage and current by using only information from the primary-side of the LED lamp controller. This removes the output current sense losses and eliminates the secondary-feedback circuitry. The result is a design that meets tighter constant output current requirements with fewer external components. Efficiencies can start at 80 percent for a 20W LED load, so the thermal loss is about 4W. Figure 1 gives a sample circuit, using the FL103 Fairchild FPS™ power switch device that is a controller with PSR function.
When power factor correction (PFC) is needed, Figure 2 is an example circuit using the FL7730 dimmable single-stage PFC PSR offline LED driver.
In the middle-power range, LED bulbs are designed for use in down-lights and L-lights operating at up to 50W. To meet regulatory requirements, power factor correction (PFC) is a required element. Adding the circuitry for PFC can make for a tight fit. A good way to save on footprint and cost is to use a single-stage PFC topology, since it doesn’t use a large electrolytic capacitor after the full rectification diode. Figure 3 shows a flyback converter using the FL6961 PFC controllerthat operates in Critical Conduction Mode (CCM) and has functions such as soft-start and a cycle-by-cycle current limit.
High-power lightingincludes lamps that operate above 100W, such as street lights and other outdoor applications. These designs need the best efficiency at a reasonable cost. Including PFC functionality at the input stage lets the design meet international regulations for harmonics. For the downstream converter, a resonant switching technique, which processes power in a sinusoidal manner, can lower switching losses and reduce noise. A relatively new technique, called LLC resonant switching, improves efficiency at high voltages. The LLC technique (see Figure 4) builds on the more familiar L-C resonant network by using a shunt inductor across the transformer primary winding which is naturally provided by the transformer magnetizing inductance. This improves regulation at light loads. Figure 5 shows a high-voltage driver concept with a PFC input stage followed by an LLC topology. The PFC/LLC combination can produce an efficiency of up to 92 percent. In a 400W LED driver, that means a thermal loss of 32W. Fairchild’s half-bridge LLC resonant controllers include the FLS-XS series, which combines power MOSFETS with fast recovery-type body diodes, a high-side gate-drive circuit, an accurate current-controlled oscillator, frequency limit circuit, soft-start, and built-in protection functions.
The power range of the LED bulb influences the requirements for a driver’s cost, size, and efficiency. For low-power designs, consider a PSR flyback, but in middle-power applications, a single-stage PFC topology is probably the best option. For high-power installations, an LLC topology, used in combination with a PFC input stage, is likely to provide the right balance of efficiency and cost. Fairchild supports all these topologies and has innovative solutions for every power range.
This post is also available in: Chinese (Simplified)